The passage discusses the concept of "Argument from Intimidation," where individuals use moral pressure or social approval to influence an intellectual argument instead of relying on evidence and reason. The author argues that this type of argument is a sign of cultural bankruptcy and can only be resisted by having moral certainty and being willing to take responsibility for one's beliefs. The passage provides examples of the Argument from Intimidation in various contexts, including college classrooms and political debates. The author maintains that this type of argument is not a legitimate way to engage in intellectual discussions and that it is important to be able to defend one's beliefs through reason and evidence alone. Finally, the passage emphasizes the importance of having a clear and consistent set of convictions and being willing to take responsibility for them in order to engage in meaningful debates.